Why Steven Joyce should just man up and dump Novopay.

Last Tuesday, NZEI members throughout the country were asked to show Steven Joyce, the Minister of Everything (including Novopay) that we want action on Novopay and we want it now.  It seems the Minister got a wee bit titchy when the unions confronted him about compensation to schools for the mega amount of time their admin staff has spent on Novopay stuff ups at the expense of their other expected duties, with some schools having to take on extra staff to cover the Novopay workload.  I'm sure you all remember that when he first took on the role back in the end of January that he mentioned this was something he would look into.  So after his titchiness, NZEI thought a show of force might remind him how schools are feeling.  Thirty-five National MPs had a protest of some sort outside of their office, and if some locations didn't have an MP's electorate office, they just protested somewhere people could see them.

I dutifully organised a small protest outside of the office of our local National MP.  During the organisation of this protest, some admin officers shared their experiences of Novopay with me.  I'm sharing two such stories with you. 

Heather is the admin person at a small, isolated rural village school with a roll of less than 50.  The other week, over three days, 11 hours alone was spent on dealing with Novopay.  For the first six months, she couldn't access so many aspects of Novopay through her log in because of one little tickbox that she knew nothing about - instead, Heather had to do her work using the principal's log in, an apparent no-no.  It took six months to solve this problem because the Novopay staff didn't know how to solve it, and despite the fact that she continually reported the problem and was told it was a priority to solve.  In the end someone from the MOE told her how to solve it.  Heather will no longer go through Novopay to solve her little school's backlog of problems; she has decided she gets better results dealing directly with the MOE.  Her school has outstanding pay issues still to be dealt with.

This next part is in the words of Vicki:

I am an office administrator and I too have had numerous issues with Novopay. One example is that last pay period I was on hold for 112 minutes before being cut off as they answered the call. I emailed advising I had been cut off after holding that long and requesting an urgent call back - I'm still waiting!!! I rang again straight away and held for another 1 hour 45 min before the call was answered. That's 4 hours out of my day just on 1 issue!

Vicki is the admin person at another rural school with less than 120 students.

These schools only have one admin person.  They are also expected to answer the phone (a bit hard when you are on hold with Novopay for two hours), order supplies, receive supplies, help students with stationery issues, be the sickbay monitor, monitor accounts, photocopy for staff, assist the principal in admin duties (i.e. newsletters, letters, typing, etc.), laminate and bind, deal with public and parental inquiries, collate and stamp resources and load onto the asset register..... and so much more than I could possibly put in.

In the last six months, these admin wizzes have had their workload doubled by a computer program!!  Some have even walked away from their jobs in despair as they can not bear what Novopay has done to their jobs.

A friend of mine, Louise, recently returned to primary school teaching after two years in private ECE.  She is an experienced teacher with well over twenty years in the profession.  She got her first payslip - and couldn't open it.  She appealed on Facebook for help.  I told her to use her MOE number with a zero in front as a password.  She did.  It didn't work.

Louise was one of those "lucky" people who start a new job and get a new MOE number courtesy of Novopay, despite having a long history with the MOE.  This new MOE number means that Novopay has no record of her qualifications, service, sick leave, etc.  Louise is being paid on the untrained rate, approximately $26,000, almost $30,000 below where she definitely should be, if not more.  She has had to go back to the institution she got her qualification from to get an academic transcript to get paid properly.  She has supplied Novopay with all the relevant details through her school's admin officer, and is now taking bets on when she will be paid at the correct rate.  I bet four months.  If that is so, when she does get paid, she will get a massive backpay, be taxed at a higher tax rate and then will have to wait until after April 2014 to get that tax back.

Today on Q&A, Steven Joyce said he'd be making a decision on the viability of Novopay before the end of the month.  He said that the first thing he thinks about when he wakes up in the morning is Novopay (not the toilet?) and that they are doubling or tripling the staff at Novopay to solve the backlog, but that finding skilled people had been a big issue.  He said the government had put $5 million into solving this problem, and later on they would look at getting that money back from Talent2.

Well, Mr Joyce, I have some advice for you:  DUMP NOVOPAY!!!

And this is why:
*  Novopay is a poorly written computer program.
*  Novopay is a poorly built computer program.
*  It had 147 bugs before it went live.
*  Not all of those bugs are fixed six months after going live.
*  More bugs are appearing each pay round in addition to the orginal bugs.
*  No one seems to understand how Novopay was written or built.
*  Other IT experts say it is junk programming.
*  The people at NZ Post have suffered another Talent2 payroll since April 2011 and it is only just now coming right after 20+ months of stuff ups and disruptions.

And all this is in addition to the fact that Talent2 did not meet most, if any, of their milestones and took longer than was planned to deliver the program and that it was never properly trialled.

Mr Joyce says that returning to Datacom, the previous provider, would not fix the problem straight away.  But the big difference between Datacom and Novopay is this:  Datacom uses people to do the work; Novopay is a faulty computer program.  One can reason with a person and work with them to solve a problem; Novopay, being a computer program, is a different kettle of fish.

Under the old system, with Datacom, each payroll officer worked with a small group of schools.  They built a relationship with the principals and admin staff of each school and understood the needs of each school.  Yes, errors did occur, but they never rolled through weeks and months of not being solved like the errors with Novopay have.  With Datacom, often the issue was rectified the next day and a manual payment made by either them or the school to the staff member affected.  Novopay seems to say it will be fixed next payroll.... and then a few months later it isn't and more problems have compounded.

Back in 2008 I had several issues with Datacom over a few weeks when I was relieving in both primary and secondary sectors.  Because my payslips detailed where and when I was at it was easy to contact schools concerned to solve the problem.  On one occasion I had to contact Datacom directly, and after a bit of stern pursuasion, I managed to get through to someone who could solve the problem within days.  I'm glad I'm not relieving now.  To be a reliever being paid by Novopay would send me to the funny farm!!

Several weeks of misspayments was not fun.  But I feel for those support staff workers and teachers who have been affected by over/under/non payments for anywhere up to six months.  If we have to suffer through this for two years like NZ Post staff, then that is totally unacceptable!!

Quite frankly, Novopay has failed to meet the standard, and as a result, Novopay should be kicked into touch as soon as practically possible.

Christchurch - some reflections of the February announcements for the 'rejuvenation' of education in Christchurch

On the 18th of February Christchurch schools were told their 'interim' fates.  Some schools were spared from closure/merger and will either remain on site (being repaired or rebuilt on that site) and some will be rebuilt on another site.  Some schools on the other hand will be closed or merged with another school, meaning that some communities will lose their identity, lose the place that has truly held many together since the total devastation that wrought Christchurch and its surrounds on the 22nd of February 2011.  Some schools, particularly around Aranui, still have decisions to be made.

But one thing I found most incredulous was the timeframe.

All these closures and mergers are to be completed for the beginning of the 2014 year.

This timeline is completely at odds with the conversations many of these schools have had with the Ministry of Education and the Minister of Education herself.  Many schools had been told as part of the consultation last year that there was a timeframe up to 2016 for these changes to be implemented.

In particular, several intermediate schools checked with the Ministry that any students entering Year 7 in 2013 would be able to complete their Year 8 at the same school in 2014.  They were given these assurances, with at least one of the school's having evidence of Hekia Parata saying so herself - but when challenged in parliament by Chris Hipkins she did what she (and every other National minister according to the Hobbit document) does best:  LIED THROUGH HER TEETH!!

Of course students, parents and communities are devasted.  The central hub of thse communities is being ripped away from them, from many people who still live in damaged houses, drive damaged streets and can not go far without a constant reminder of how their lives have changed on that day two years ago.

Principals and teachers and support staff are devastated, and not only because there will be inevitable job losses with the closure and merger of schools.  They are devastated because the school is their community too.  They have attachments to the people of that community be they colleagues, students or parents.  Their schools have a culture, their own specialness, that will be gone once their school closes or merges.  The principals, teachers and support staff will mourn the spirit of their school.

The general consensus is that National wants to push through these closures and mergers by the end of 2013 before the school year starts in 2014 because 2014 is an election year.  National seems to think that if they have swept the situation out of the way before an election year starts that people will forget.

I actually think that is rather short-sighted.  The people of Christchurch have suffered trauma after trauma over the last two and a half year.  Those who have been affected most by school closures, lack of progress in dealing with insurance companies, lack of safe and healthy accommodation, the slow rebuild, etc. will remember.  They will know who shut their child's school and forced them to travel to another school.  They will know who has not gotten things moving in the rebuild.  They will know who let accommodation in Christchurch get to the state it is in.  Those people are voters.

Another reason why I think this is a stupid idea is the time table is impossible.  To close a school can be done.  But to merge a school in such a short time, to ensure that at the preferred sites there will be enough classrooms, toilets, plumbing, wiring, data connections, play areas, hard lanscaping, staffing, a school culture, etc. in a mere ten months is laughable.  There are not enough trades people in Christchurch now to do the rebuild, so schools will be hard pressed to get someone to do all this work.  So when these schools are not ready to roll at the end of January 2014, people will remember.

It is also indicative of this government.  Since National came in they have come up with many bizzare ideas and policies.  With little thought to how these impact people, jobs, communities, infrastructure, etc. they do little if any research, change a perfectly good law and ram something through that is full of holes and costs the country socially and economically for years!!  And the only people who do benefit are those on the rich list - again.

So here I make a prediction for some schools.

Hekia will want to look better in the public eye.  She has to.  After stuff up after stuff up last year, and the recent poll result in Canterbury that said 71% of people thought John Key shouldn't have returned her to the post of Minister of Education, Hekia has to save some face.  And this is how I predict she will do it:

• She will extend the date of closure/merger for some schools - in particular, the intermediates (she has to, she's been caught out in a bare faced lie again).
• She will tell you that these schools put up strong and convincing arguments in the consultation that will occur until the end of March.
• She will tell you that she listened with an open mind and heart (debatable!).
• She may tell you that MOE forecasting had shown that school infrastructure was going to be difficult to be made ready for the beginning of the 2014 year to accommodate more students on a merged site.
• She may tell you that this is to ensure that some merged schools can work more closely together to define their culture.

Now this prediction is only for some schools.  Hekia still has to close some schools.  How else will she make room for that riddiculous idea of Partnership/Charter Schools?  And yes, I make these predictions from another island, I haven't stood in Christchurch since the earthquake.  But I watch, I listen, and I've observed how Hekia works closely.  So let's see how these predictions play out.

I think everyone agrees that resources and infrastructure and all that has to be looked at in Christchurch, including schools.  Everyone agrees that there needs to be certainty.  But everyone should also agree that the information is correct, consultation is transparent and moves in both directions, that the decisions are fair and straight forward, and that the time table is achievable and allows a good job to be done.  Will that happen for Christchurch schools though?

John Key is too "comfortable"!

John Key is too damned comfortable.

Well, I guess he can be considering his investment portfolio earns him so much money he is able to donate his Prime Minister's salary to charity.  He also sent his kids to private school and Steffi has spent the last few years in France, studying I presume.  He and his lovely wife live in a lovely big house in Parnell with their cat and Max, and it looks very comfortable from what I can see from the Women's Weekly articles I have read.

But John Key seems to be very comfortable with a lot of other things that many of us Kiwis are not so comfortable with, such as:

• Hekia Parata's communication ability and how well she has performed as the Minister of Education.
• How the Novopay debacle has been handled, particulary the role his Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister and leader, Bill English, has played.
• That Steven Joyce will be able to solve the Novopay problem.
• That so many people, particulary skilled and educated people, are leaving New Zealand to work in Australia.
• That the people who have now lost their jobs or are owed thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars courtesy to Mainzeal going into receivership will find new jobs.
• That the NZ dollar is so high compared to the American dollar.
• The affordability and accessability of housing in New Zealand to rent or own.
• The impact
• Privacy issues and how they are handled, from the MSD kiosks, to ACC files going to the wrong person, to Novopay payslips being sent to the wrong people and schools being able to access details of people who don't work for them.

There are probably many I have not mentioned, but why go on and on.....

But I can tell you that people out there, the people who don't live on Planet Key, are not comfortable with how things are going.

This is a screen shot of a little interaction I've been having on Twitter the last couple of days with so meone who is/was a Mainzeal employee and does not live on Planet Key.  As you can see, NzedKIWI is not comfortable with the situation, nor confident about finding work in a hurry.

Google Novopay and you will come up with endless stories of teachers and support staff who have not been paid correctly if at all.  You will also find stories of Hekia Parata and Craig Foss as well as Talent2 not appologising or taking responsibility.  You will see stories detailing how the milestones have not been met as the payroll system was developed, how the errors were evident before the "Go Live" was given and that it could take up to two years to fix.  You will see stories about the inquiries and investigations into who is responsible (I have that answer, it won't cost much for me to tell you) and how these investigations and inquiries and the fix will cost the tax payers even more money!  Yet John Key seems to be comfortable with all this.  So comfortable that Hekia Parata is still the Minister of Education!

However there are many education workers who are not comfortable.  They can't pay their rent or mortgage.  Bills like credit cards, telephone and internet, electricity, rates, insurance, HPs, etc can't be paid.  There have been stories of people not being able to put food on the table or petrol in their cars to go to work.

It is so bad now that someone wrote on Campbell Live's Facebook wall about how they were behind someone in the checkout at the supermarket this last Wedneday, the day money should have been in every education workers' bank account.  Their card declined, they couldn't pay for the basic staples they had put on the counter.  The education worker burst into tears, appologised to the check out person and went out to the ATM to check their balance.  They found they had not been paid.  The CL contributor followed the education worker, and offered to pay for the groceries.  The education worker, tearfully declined.  The CL contributer was so incensed they posted on Campbell Live's wall encouraging them to further push into the Novopay debacle.  So obviously, the CL contributer is just as uncomfortable about the Novopay issue as many education workers are.

Just briefly, many people in NZ are not comfortable that their nearest and dearest have to go to Australia to get work, thus separating families.  Many people are not comfortable that NZ is not going the next step with Kyoto or monitoring our environment appropriately and reporting on it.  Many people feel that this messes with our clean, green image, with out 100% Pure image.  And that we are not that clean and green as we would like to be also leaves many people uncomfortable.  There are many people who are not comfortable that they can not afford to rent or buy a house, especially in Auckland and Christchurch.  There are many manufacturers and farmers that are not comfortable with how high the dollar is.

As a teacher and about to be a first home buyer who has watched friends move to Australia for a 'better life' and is not happy with aspects of our environment, I am not comfortable John Key.  I am most uncomfortable with the fact that you are so comfortable about everything!!

John Key, you fail the standard.

Why Hekia Parata (and Anne, Craig and Bill) should go!!

I've been wanting to write my opinions about Hekia Parata for months - but held off in the belief that the right time to blog would arrive.  It has.

If anything, the last week has shown why Hekia Parata should not be a minister of the government of New Zealand.  It beggars belief that John Key did not stand her down in his cabinet reshuffle a few weeks ago - and that really must be due to Hekia's mate Bill English (more on him later) that she still is a minister.  The fact that John Key appointed Steven Joyce to sort out the Novopay debarcle also speaks volumes.  It tells us that Hekia cocked up and is unable to fix it, to be blunt.

But Hekia isn't the only one who should be for the chopping block.  Read on as I explain.

The last week has been daily revelations of what has happened since the contract for the education payroll first went to tender in 2005.  John Campbell (Campbell Live Friday 1 February 2013 "What really happened in the Novopay debarcle") did a wonderful blow by blow of highlights, and the following really stood out:

• Talent2 were shortlisted for the payroll contract in 2005 (under a Labour government).
• Talent2 won the payroll contract in 2008 (under a Labour government).
• Talent2 said they would have the new education payroll up and running in 2010.
• The name "Novopay" first became the label for the payroll in October 2008.
• "There is a good relationship between the Ministry and Talent2" - minutes from the Novopay Board in November 2008.
• "Project in Yellow status overall due to slippage in some deliverables" - minutes from the Novopay Board in May 2009 (under a National government - Anne Tolley the Minister of Education).
• "Feedback has raised three areas of concern... risks around the late start for the payroll service" - for a briefing to Cabinet in July 2009 (under a National government).
• "Concerns raised on slippage in relation to milestone dates.... Talent2 have undertaken to improve processes..." - minutes from the Novopay Board in August 2009.
• "Information lacking still.  Need for a frank assessment... risks around changes to the schedule" - minutes from the Novopay Board in February 2010.
• "The confidence level of the proposed 'Go Live' date remained low" - minutes from the Novopay Board February/March 2010 (under a National government with Anne Tolley still the Minister of Education).
• Go Live formally delayed until 2011 in May 2010.
• "The Board should real concern the project had missed the first milestone..." - minutes from the Novopay Board in July 2010.
• "There are also some trust issues between teams... A frank and open discussion took place" - minutes from the Novopay Board in July 2010.
• "The Board needs to have confidence in the Project to be able to report to the Minister and the Cabinet on progress" - minutes from the Novopay Board in January 2012 (under a National government with Hekia Parata having been the Minister of Education for one month).
• "The Board noted it does not have confidence in Talent2's forecasting..." - minutes from the Novopay Board in January 2012.
• "A formal warning letter was delivered to Talent2" - minutes from the Novopay Board in April 2012.
• "Talent2 is laying the foundations for an allegation that the Ministry is in breach of its good faith obligations..." from a highly confidential internal MOE memo dated 19 April 2012.  "This is a clear signal that Talent2 will adopt the position that any termination by the Ministry would amount to repudiation of contract... If correct, that would entitle Talent2... to pursue the Ministry for damages."

So back in November 2008, all was cheery and rosy, the honeymoon stage so to speak.  So what went fundamentally wrong between then and August 2009?  I could say that it was a change of government, a change of leadership at the top.  We all know that as soon as National came to power there was a dramatic change of culture within the Ministry of Education, they stopped talking to schools and ECE centres and collaboration and consultation ceased.

John Campbell told us that Talent2 were known to use their charm offensive when challenged over the "slippages" in delivering milestones.  But one wonders why Anne Tolley, then Minister of Education, didn't challenge these: 

• Was she just too inexperienced as a minister?
• Did the MOE cover up the extent of the deficiencies of Talent2?
• Were the MOE too scared to tell Mrs Tolley what was happening?

When National came in, they had a policy of decreasing the public service, taking people out of backroom jobs and putting them on the frontline.  The MOE was not immune to this, and lost some quality people with a lot of institutional knowledge and experience.  Those remaining in the MOE may well have been considering their job security when it came to rocking the boat over the Novopay lack of progress.  Combine that loss of knowledge and experience with concerns over job security and the fact that Anne Tolley was quite well known for throwing wobblies when she was told something she didn't want to hear from the MOE, and the answers to the above questions could be answered with: "quite possibly, yes."

Karen Sewell was still the Secretary of Education at this stage, but left the position in 2011 when Lesley Longstone took up the role.  It was not a secret that Ms Sewell was not a fan of National's education policies and was having difficulty stomaching the implementation of these policies.  One does wonder if she also tried to have a frank discussion with Minister Tolley over the lack of completion of milestones by Talent2, but was rebuffed.

So we know that there were concerns as early as August 2009 that the new Novopay pay roll system was in trouble for implementation in 2010, but then 2010 comes and "confidence is low" in Talent2, the 'Go Live' is pushed back to 2011 and no one is jumping up and down??  This is public money!!  John Key talked constantly of transparent government, but where is the transparency here?  Shouldn't there have been enough concern at the fact these milestones were not reached in mid 2010 to start an audit or investigation of some sort?  But then again, Anne Tolley was somewhat distracted by the strong opposition to National Standards that was in full swing at the time.

And as we know, Novopay did not 'Go Live' in 2011.  But New Zealand Post's new pay roll system did in April 2011.  "EPMU national industry organiser Joe Gallagher told NZ Newswire that problems with the pay system at NZ Post provided by Talent2 are ongoing more than 18 months after it went live on April 1, 2011."  Check it out by clicking here.  "Mr Gallagher said problems with the Talent2 system at NZ Post begged the question of why the company got another government contract....  NZ Post workers had been over-paid and under-paid. There had been thousands of mistakes from a system that was not fit for purpose.... 'I could go on all day about it,' he said.  Even now it is still not perfect, and they are still ironing the problems out of this "dog"."

Would it scare you much if I told you now that the Fire Service will this year "Go Live" with a pay roll developed by Talent2 as well?  My source tells me that fire fighters are nervous and are ready to walk off the job if the first pay goes wrong.

John Campbell's summary misses out anything that happened regarding Novopay between July 2010 and January 2012.  One wonders what happened, or didn't, during that 18 month period.  Because wouldn't this have been a good time to make sure it was fixed?  Is this the reason why Anne Tolley was moved sideways from the Education portfolio into the Police and Corrections portfolios rather than failing to get on top of the resistance to National Standards and plain being a useless and tactless tantrum throwing Minister of Education (by the way, I feel your pain police members and prison/corrections staff)?

So after the 2011 election John Key reshuffled his cabinet.  Moving Anne Tolley out of the Education portfolio was the answer to the sector's prayers.  We looked at Hekia Parata as a new set of eyes and ears, and hoped that she would be more forthcoming in collaborating with the different areas of the sector.

How wrong we were.

Hekia has managed to allienate the education sector in such a professional way that Anne Tolley could only profess to be an amateur!  Hekia spoke at Learning at Schools in Hamilton in January and later in April at the National Aspiring Principals Programme (NAPP) hui and impressed with her ability to speak with authority of the issues of the day and statistics without referring to notes.  By the time of the Rural Principal's conference in August, the announcements to the Christchurch Schools in August and her amazing performances at the NZEI and PPTA annual meetings in September/October, we knew that she had the same speil to give to everyone and did not like being challenged. 

She pointed her finger at the Rural Principal's conference, waggling it at them like they were naughty children.  She knew what all those colour coded badges meant the day that she sat with Lesley Longstone and Gerry Brownlee to tell the principals and board chairs the fates of their schools.  She sat there with a sour look on her face and steam coming out of her ears at NZEI's annual meeting because members rebutted her policies and ideas and told her how it actually was, but she also offended every teacher in the room when she told us we were failing to teach guided reading, mathematics and science effectively (maybe that's because National dumped the Literacy Project in favour of National Standards, hijacked the Numeracy Project with National Standards, and decimated our advisory services so we no long have science advisors)!  And then she told off the PPTA annual meeting because Pasifica and Maori children are failing because teachers don't pronounce their names properly (perhaps we should just call her Patricia).

And then there are Hekia's other brilliant standout efforts of the last year:

• Ignoring advice of the MOE and following Treasury's advice instead to increase class sizes under the lie of "improving teacher quality.
• Ignoring the electorate/parents cries of foul against increasing class sizes.
• The backdown - only after John Key realised it was an epic fail of a policy and was hurting his popularity in the blue ribbon electorates.
• The announcement that the minimum teacher qualification should be a one year post-grad (God help children if this comes to pass!).
• Signing off on Novopay to "Go Live", despite the Novopay Board saying that there were at least 147 problems with it, without investigating further.
• Not fronting over Novopay or the reorganisation of Christchurch schools.
• An atrocious relationship with her Secretary of Education, Lesley Longstone, which spilled out into the public domain and culminated in Longstone resigning.
• Going through several private secretaries and a losing a senior advisor two months into a two year secondment.  The lastest private secretary to go was just before Christmas. 
• Passing the buck for Novopay onto Craig Foss.
• Refusing to attend important events in the education community within New Zealand and overseas.
• Refusing to engage with the NZEI, PPTA, NZAIMS, early childhood organisations and other organisations over educational issues.
• And then to top it off there was her comment about how it was "karma" that MOE staff had their pay affected last week - what she failed to comprehend when she said that was that a lot of those MOE staff have nothing to do with Novopay as they could be speech language therapists, GSE teachers.....

And as for John Key's assertion that there is no other person who cares as much about the achievement or the underachievement of Maori and Pasifica children than Hekia Parata, well he does a disservice to every teacher with Maori and Pasifica students in their classes.  And that comment on her being a top notch communicator - sure, if you like her cliches and jingoisms, I'm quite sure she would make a killing in the world of advertising or sales... perhaps she should work with Suzanne Paul selling some Natural Glow or some new wonder vacume cleaner!!

For another blogger's view of Hekia, read this blog "What the Hekia?" and realise I'm not the only one who thinks Hekia is not up to the job.

So far I have commented on Anne Tolley and Hekia Parata in their time as the Minister of Education.  I have shown that they both had numerous opportunities to prevent the train wreck that is Novopay.

But two more people have a part to play in this debarcle. 

Craig Foss was given responsibility for Novopay.  I've been wondering when that happened exactly.... does anyone know the answer?  John Key claims that this was done to allow Hekia to oversee the set up for Charter Schools (another dog of an idea), which one would think should have been in John Banks' court considering it was supposedly an ACT condition of coalition, but then Banks was a bit busy at the time dealing with his dodgy donation deals.  How soon did Hekia know that Novopay was a "dog with a few fleas" (to borrow Steven Joyce's apt phrase) and decided to throw that hospital pass onto someone else?  Why didn't Craig Foss ask the questions when the milestones weren't met and the Novopay Board questioned weather or not the "Go Live" would work?  Why was he not more upfront with the education community and the questioning in parliament?  Why did Craig Foss sign off on the "Go Live" despite the 147 identified errors in the pay roll system?

And then there is Hekia's good mate Bill English.  Minister of Finance, Deputy Prime Minister, Deputy National Leader, number two in the National Party rankings.  (I have a lot more I could say about Bill English and his performance, but another time).  Hekia is a part of this government because she is Bill English's protege and mate.  And Bill English, I assume because he is the Minister of Finance, also signed off on Novopay to "Go Live".  Surely, the man who is in charge of the government's finances, in charge of how our taxes are spent, would make sure he was approving the go ahead for a project that wasn't going to cost the tax payer a fortune and embarrass the government he is deputy leader of? 

But it seems the answers to all my questions regarding the roles of Anne Tolley, Hekia Parata, Craig Foss and Bill English are rather unsatisfactory.

As a tax payer I feel we are being cheated by a government that can not dot its 'i's and cross its 't's in the rush to implement poor policy and sell off our country.

As a teacher who has begun at a new school this last week, I wait nervously for Wednesday morning to see if I have been paid or not (my new principal assures me that all the feedback from Novopay is good, but please excuse me if I have no trust in Novopay).

Basically, Novopay has been an epic fail and should be thrown to the sharks.  Hekia Parata has been an epic fail as the Minister of Education.  But to sum it up, I have a little report card below:

• Hekia Parata  =  failed to meet the standard
• Anne Tolley  =  failed to meet the standard
• Craig Foss     =  failed to meet the standard
• Bill English   =  failed to meet the standard

Lesley Longstone resigns - I'm riddiculously happy - but...

So Lesley Longstone resigned on Wednesday 19 December from her role as the Secretary of Education in New Zealand.  The State Services Commission, Iain Rennie, announced her resignation at a press conference in the middle of the day.  He said that the decision was reached three weeks ago after relationships with Hekia Parata, the Minister of Education, had reached a tipping point after being rather strained for most of the year.

It is interesting to note that Lesley Longstone left the country the Friday before the announcement to spend Christmas in the UK.  The Prime Minister's office also told reporters that Hekia Parata is on "holiday" (translation:  we gagged her!).  Considering that thousands of teachers, principals, teacher aides, other support staff and cleaners/caretakers are still having issues getting paid correctly thanks to Novopay being such a dog, one wonders why these two are on "holiday" at all.

I wrote a blogpost about Lesley Longstone back in October reviewing her time in the position up to that point and I found that she had not met the standard required in a Secretary of Education.

Many people with the announcement of her resignation have said that Lesley has been the fall guy for Hekia Parata's incompetence.  I would agree with that to an extent - but in my opinion, Lesley should never have gotten the position in the first place.  National only put her in that job because they knew no Kiwi in their right mind would dismantle our high performing education and advance GERM.  National knew they had to put a foreigner in charge.

They have also done this in the Treasury, Health and Social Development portfolios.  The lady put in charge of Social Development, Janet Grossman, bailed a few months ago, after nine months in the position.

The problem with using foreigners in these key positions is that there are things about New Zealand they just don't get - they don't understand our ethos of egalitaranism; they don't get our committment to the Treaty of Waitangi and the pain we have taken to recognise it; they don't get the cultural intracicies of the Maori and Pacific cultures; they don't get the history of our education, health or social welfare systems. 

With the resignation of Lesley Longstone, many people are now calling for Hekia to also fall on her sword.  It would seem that along with Hekia's miss steps this last year in the Education portfolio (another blog that I have yet to attempt!), Hekia has also had some difficult relationships with not just Lesley, but also with her private secretaries and key advisors.  This is somewhat telling.

Yet John Key continued to state he had full confidence in Hekia Parata as the Minister of Education - after he'd finished doing Gangnam Styles and "marrying" a radio DJ.

Iain Rennie has appointed former Public Service chief executive Peter Hughes as acting Secretary of Education when Lesley leaves the post on 9 February 2013.  Lesley will not have completed her five year contract, so she is getting paid out, a number expected to be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.  Mr Hughes is described as someone who will take Education out of the headlines by running a tight ship.  If the Novopay debarcle hasn't been sorted out by then, it should be one of his top priorities, along with ensure a fair, accurate and transparent process for the provision of education in Christchurch.

Now our government has the task of replacing Lesley.  I should think that the first criteria should be someone who knows the nuances of New Zealand education.  Someone who holds dear the values that our education system was founded on back in 1880, the values that Peter Fraser and C.E. Beeby installed as our education system matured, the values that our widely admired (but stymied by National Standard), New Zealand Curriculum strives to teach our children.  There is a real opportunity here for the government to redirect education policy to improve what we already have rather than continuing to break it down, denegrade it, destroy it.

But our government clearly has their sights set on the GERM doctrine.

So I dread to think who they will take on to carry on their GERM agenda.

Novopay - or Nevapay!!

The Novopay issue has gone from bad to laughable to worse and the crystal ball is not looking favourably towards a resolution in this coming pay week. 

Google Novopay (go on, I dare you) and you will see endless complaints and news stories on this debarcle.  Thanks Campbell Live for taking up the cause for so many people who have been stuffed around by Novopay.

Novopay has a near $30 million contract with the Ministry of Education to service the payroll of the education sector.  So who does this pay roll cover?

• primary and intermediate teachers
• secondary teachers
• kindergarten teachers
• principals at secondary, primary, intermediate and middle schools
• support staff (e.g. office administrators, teacher aides, librarians, science lab assistants, etc...)
• cleaning staff and caretaker staff employed directly by schools
• resource teachers (e.g. RTLB, RTLit....)
• special education workers (e.g. speech language therapists, physiotherapists.....)
• relief teachers in all sectors

There are over 120,000 people on this payroll at any one time and all of these professionals have had cases of their pay being affected.  Many of these people are the sole bread winners of their families.  All of these people would have bills to pay, even mortgages and/or loans to service.  A bit hard though when you are not getting paid.

Who is Novopay?  Novopay is a payroll company owned by Talent2 Global who state:

Talent2 multiplies the power and productivity of people. We are the leading HR BPO organisation in the Asia Pacific region, working with clients across diverse organisation types and industries to deliver end-to-end talent management solutions that put people first.

When you go to their website, click on the payroll section and then view the page regarding their stories of success with clients, New Zealand's education payroll does not feature (as at 2:29pm 11/11/12).  I guess with the list of problems outlined briefly below, it doesn't quite feature success, in fact, one could say that Novopay is WELL BELOW the standard!

So what are the common complaints we have been hearing about Novopay in regards to being paid, or not being paid:

• not being paid
• being paid too much
• being paid too little
• being paid when you are not supposed to be being paid (i.e. while on leave)
• being paid one cent more or less than you are supposed to be
• not having payments made to third parties (i.e. Kiwisaver and superannuation schemes - one wonders if our tax payments are being made, or student loan repayments)
• Not being paid for part days (apparently this isn't something their system can do)

Then there are the pay slips themselves:

• no prior notification in regards to the password needed to open it (have you noticed you still need the password even after you have saved the PDF to your own computer to open your payslip?  I'm finding this very irritating and inconvenient!).
• The lack of information as to which days you have been paid for if you are a reliever.

Then there are the other wee inconveniences:

• MOE numbers have changed when people changed schools or came back from leave.
• Employment history such as qualifications, payscales, sick leave, years of service wiped due to either the change of MOE numbers or sheer incompetence in the system.
• The fact that if you need to check what you have already inputted for the fortnigh, there is no click on button in the website to do this (I tried to help the admin lady at my school find it - no luck)
• The fact that they have stuffed up most part-time employees' pay because their system didn't accept part days!

Talent 2 has had at least four years to get their Novopay system up and running.  They got the contract in 2008!  According to this editorial in the Dominion, Novopay have asked repeatedly for delays to their system coming online so they could iron out the bugs and ''to ensure we introduce a payroll system that pays every staff member the right amount, on time, every time''.  Tui ad anyone?

There was no testing the system properly before it went online.  Infact, earlier this year, Novopay asked their start time to be deferred until into 2013, but the MOE refused this request.  Who is responsible?  Well, let's see, who is in charge of the MOE?  Lesley Longstone.  Again Lesley fails to meet the standard as this directly falls under her sphere of influence.  For more information, read Kelvin Smythe's blog.

Schools are now sending invoices to the MOE to request reimbursement for the extreme amount of staff hours now spent on sorting out payroll stuff ups by Novopay.  Auckland principals are refusing to implement MOE policy until the stuff ups stop and are sorted.  Some people, mainly support staff, have stopped going to work - how can you run a car to go to work if you have no money because you haven't been paid?  Many people have run up credit card debt, defaulted on loan and/or mortgage payments, paid their bills late - if at all - and incurred penalty fees.  Should they bare the brunt of this when it was outside of their control, when previously they had been paid properly and on time?

So as I write this blog, on the eve of another pay day, keeping an eye on the chat about Novopay on Facebook and Twitter, I can tell you that a number of people have not received their payslips for tomorrow, that some have received a payslip and found errors, and some have lost hope in being paid tomorrow.

Three months into the actual implementation and Novopay have not met the standard.

Who will take responsibility?  Will it be a lacky at Novopay?  What about Talent2?  Will Lesley Longstone take responsibility?  Or will some lacky further down the MOE food chain be sacrificed?  Does the buck stop with Craig Foss or Hekia Parata?

I don't see this situation being resolved anytime soon.  With End Of Year pays and changes of staff in the New Year, I see a whole lot more problems in my crystal ball when it comes to Novopay for the education profession, the MOE and Novopay.

Bullshit John Key says....

This morning I watched John Key on Breakfast (TV1) because Rawdon Christie said that the Prime Minister would be on to discuss the backout of Kyoto by his government and the Novopay debarcle.

Check it out here:  http://tvnz.co.nz/breakfast-news/john-key-kyoto-protocol-backdown-video-5209695

Predictably, John Key defended the decision to have Associate Education Minister Craig Foss deal with Novopay.  Predictably he cited commercial sensitivity when questioned about the sanctions Novopay and its parent company Talent2 would face if the issues are not fixed by the Wednesday deadline Mr Foss has set.  (By the way, don't hold your breath on that one; our admin lady has already picked up the same set of errors for our cleaner/caretaker position that we've had for the last three months!)

Craig Foss has come under some intense scrutiny by the opposition in parliament over the Novopay debarcle.  Nanaia Mahuta (Labour Education spokesperson) has called for Hekia Parata to step in and solve the issue herself.  The NZEI has called for a public inquiry into the Novopay debarcle.  However, John Key claims that Mr Foss is doing a great job with this issue he has been delegated, and that it is actually Novopay at fault, that it is Novopay who is responsible for fixing the issues.

John claimed that the previous payroll provider (Datacom/Multiserve) couldn't carry on as their system was breaking down.  Well, that is news to administrators and principals in schools about the country I am sure!!  The lovely admin lady at our school scoffed at the PM's assertion.  She has been in the job for ten years or so at our school, and she has never had a headache with the payroll like she has had with it since Novopay went online.  Even the fact that she is an administrator at a neighbouring school as well put Novopay in a complete spin!!  She dreads pay week now!

John Key tried to claim that there are many intricacies in teachers' pay.  Yes, there are some extra allowances, units, etc., but Novopay don't know their percentages, fractions and decimals because one of their biggest problems in paying people is the fact they don't seem to be able to process people who work part time or relieve for part days.  So I guess they fail the numeracy standard.

Between 5:38-6:20 in the Breakfast interview, John Key valiantly tries to defend Hekia Parata as the Minister of Education.  He made this very true statement: "Quite frankly if you put any of the twenty of us in Cabinet into that portfolio we'd face just the same issues."

Well Mr Key, let me put it in simple words even you can understand:  Your Minister of Education, regardless of who they are, will be passionately opposed by the education sectors while they continue to push forward policies that are detrimental to New Zealand's quality public education system, best practise, sound research and what is best for children!!!!!

"A well organised opposition" is what Mr Key said has been mounted against Hekia Parata - again here he speaks the truth.  We are a well organised opposition because we have good practise and research on our side.  Parents want what is best for their children - and they are increasingly aware that NACT policy is not in the best interests of their children.

In regards to Kyoto, I have to say I am very disappointed that New Zealand will not be participating.  It seems that John Key and his government do not value the clean green 100% pure image we have spent a fortune on advertising to the world for the last decade or more.  "We are a tiny, tiny part of world emissions..." says John Key - yes we are, but we need to make sure our tiny, tiny part of world emissions is dealt to.  If we don't do our bit, how can we expect to exert influence over growing industrial nations like India and China to get them to decrease their emissions?

So that really is just the bullshit that John Key said today.