Sunday, 19 June 2016

National Library services to schools - are they being run into the ground as closure exercise?

In December 2014, while we teachers were flat out with a million end of year tasks and dead on our feet, an email quietly slipped into our inboxes informing us of changes to how National Library would loan books to schools and support learning during 2015.
Luckily, NZEI still had some life left in the Wellington office and immediately began co-ordinating a campaign to halt and reverse the changes.  Over the next few months, there were protests, letters, tweets, speeches... but alas, the changes did come to pass, if slightly delayed to start in Term 4 2015 instead of Term 2.
National Library's logo - via their website.
Fast forward to 2016, and in March the rumblings started on the NZ Teachers (Primary) Facebook page that the new National Library Service had failed to meet the standard set by the previous way it was done.  Books weren't arriving; when they did there were not enough; the standard of the service had slipped - over a cliff and was half way down, barely conscious and hanging on by its fingertips.
Last week I was on the page and someone mentioned how poor the service was this term, and that despite it being week 7, they had yet to receive their National Library books and their inquiry was wrapping up.  After a few more comments it was apparent there was a pattern forming.
I then initiated a poll on the page, and over four days teachers posted their feedback via the poll and within the comments with their personal experiences.  Over 100 teachers said their books arrived too late for the learning they were intended to support and four teachers stated their books did not arrive at all.  Many indicated that the new process was too burdensome for one person per school to manage and there was a lack of flexibility.  Many teachers felt that they were not receiving enough books per class and that the selection was not great.  It was concerning the number of schools that now considered the process was in the too hard basket and were no long willing to utilise National Library to source books for teaching and learning.
Many teachers expressed concern that the service is deliberately being run down in an effort to turn teachers off the service, and as participation then falls it can be justified to cut the service completely.
Hon. Peter Dunne, Minister of Internal
Affairs with responsibility for the
National Library.
Photo from Parliament website.
As the feedback came in, I began tweeting Peter Dunne (Minister of Internal Affairs, which is where the National Library fits), Education Minister Hekia Parata, and National Library.  Mr Dunne was the only one to respond out of these three, and he asked me to stop clogging up his Twitter feed, collate the information and send it to him via email. 
So below is the summary I have prepared for Mr Dunne.  I have included the letter I wrote him, the collated data display, and the raw comments from teachers from last week's post and a post in March about how the National Library service is going on the NZ Teachers (Primary) Facebook page.
If, and when, I get a response from Mr Dunne I will hopefully be able to give you positive feedback on what he intends to do to fix the issues teachers have given light to.  I am eternally hopeful that Mr Dunne will take this issue seriously - I am a Sagittarian after all.

Dear Mr Dunne,

Thank you for the opportunity to present this information from teachers about the performance of National Library services in supplying books to schools and classes to support teaching and learning.

National Library has a long tradition of supporting schools, teachers and children in their teaching and learning programmes.  Throughout my twenty year teaching career I have had the privilage of utilising the services of National Library in enhancing the learning in my class.  It has given me access to books I would otherwise have had no access to.

I was extremely concerned, therefore, to receive an email in December 2014 advising that changes to the system would be enacted in 2015.  Firstly, the email arrived at an extraordinarily busy time for teachers (end of year reports, updating student records, reporting to senior management/BOTs, prize givings, concerts, trips, room changes, packing up to change schools, etc).  Secondly, the changes proposed were alarming.  Reading through the stated changes I could immediately see the issues that would arise for rural schools, especially isolated schools, those schools with unreliable internet, those schools with limited devices to take advantage of the online tools the National Library intended to supply.

On the following pages you will see a bar chart displaying the results of a poll on the NZ Teachers (Primary) Facebook page that was initiated due to comments on another post about how disappointing using National Library had become.  In the following pages, there are raw comments from teachers from the post the poll was in from last week, and from a post in mid March asking for help on how to manage how the books were now arriving from National Library so they could be tracked and not lost.  As you will see, teachers were not happy with the service in March and their disappointment is greater in June.

Teachers would appreciate that the service is reviewed.  Teachers and children are finding their teaching and learning programmes are suffering due to the poor selections arriving, if the books do arrive at all.  Many teachers have stated their books have been arriving in the last weeks of the term when the learning is wrapping up, so have not even bothered opening the boxes.

It is the general view among teachers who have spoken directly with National Library staff (usually when asking where the books are) that they are not happy with the new procedures either and staff morale is low in the National Library ranks.

Teachers are very worried that the service is being run down in order to close it down.  This service is essential for schools to access a wider variety of material than their library can provide, especially for small schools and rural schools.  Teachers want to use it, but will not use a sub-standard service that wastes their precious time and does not deliver what is requested.

I hope that any review conducted will include all relevant stakeholders, including classroom teachers, school librarians/teachers in charge, National Library and other relevant national representatives.

If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me.
The bar chart on the previous page is collated from responses to a poll on the NZ Teacher (Primary) Facebook page.  This is a private group for teachers to share resources, suggestions and ask for support from colleagues nationwide and where issues that affect teachers are discussed.  This poll began at 11:00pm on Wednesday night and the data was collated at 11:00pm on Sunday night.  The poll therefore ran for four days to collect this data.

Below are written responses from teachers about their experience using National Library services supplying books to schools since the changes came into action in Term 4 2015.  Prior to the changes being enacted, there was widespread protest and letters written about how these changes would impact schools, teaching and learning, and particularly schools in rural areas who are small.  What has been very interesting is the impacts on larger schools, as noted in the comments from individual teachers below.  I have not included the teacher’s names to preserve their privacy.

I used it every term, sometimes twice a term. I don't use it now as it is far too difficult with a few books for 450 students. I risk fines with overdue books on my teacher card at the local community libraries now. I have a choice with my selection, I can order specific books as well.

I used to use it all the time with the old system . Don't use it all now because it's too hard.

Our entire school (14 classrooms) cannot get any books until next year now because our coordinator sent off an order for one class. Once your school order has gone in that's it. It cannot be reopened.  I tried to put in an order yesterday for 4 classes but found out we're too late.

Mixed here. So far I have got what my team needs, but it takes a lot of being proactive and keeping in touch with the person in charge of it all to have it work. Huge job for her, and nowhere near as good or easy as it was.

What a joke! A library where you cannot go and select your own books. I am the co-ordinator for our school and ordered really early for the last 2 terms. Only got the books into the first few weeks of each term and so they were not used in planning during the holidays because we were not to know what we would eventually get. When the books arrived they were most suitable for the junior school (age relevance) and some teachers changed focus during the holidays and so the books were no longer relevant topic wise. These are still sitting in the box in the staffroom. We are struggling to put together our order for term 3/4 (1/2 the number of books per term) and we are wondering whether it is all worth it... sigh!

Hopeless. Book arrived far too late to be useful. First time I've just left them all in the box! What a waste of time for our staff member who coordinated and me filling out all the new criteria. Very unhappy.

It's an absolute travesty. My school is 10 mins away, I used to be able to change my books as often as I liked, chat with the wonderfully knowledgeable librarians...And now? 30 books (that's right, THIRTY) for the whole school. It's an outrage.

Quite frankly I tried to order books online in January but found that my school had not organised an admin person to take responsibility for our ordering. By the time this was resolved the term was half way through. When we eventually got books there were not enough for all 21 classes as we teach the same concept at the same time. So the small selection we seem to have has not been looked at again. I chose to give up on National Library books at that point and have got a class set from the school library instead.

It is a massive job for the teachers who offer to collect and distribute across our school. We received our quota of books for Term 2 in week 3. The system for ordering is crazy - I am grateful to the teachers who have taken it on, on our behalf!

I have had no books from national library this year and was a regular user (every term) up until this point. I don't know who the contact is in my school and no one has ever discussed book choices with teachers. I blame my school for this more than I blame the national library though!

We have to pick for term 4 now?

A bit frustrating. We were sent a skimpy lot of books on the actual topic - less than enough for one class. I haven't even seen them yet.

We are still using but books for term 2 didn't arrive until week 4! I'm hoping it will be easier to collect the books this term, now that we have a list of books for each topic. It was a nightmare last term when they were all in one big list. It is also taking teachers awhile to be able to choose the books they want for terms 3 and 4. Sure we know what our overarching topics are, but as for needing anything for term 4 that might crop up in term 3; we just don't know that yet.

I liked going in and choosing now just don't get them at all.

Takes forever for books to arrive.

Have stopped using.

Don't use it anymore - too hard.

Not happy with the new system prefer to choose books to suit my own class.

Concerned about not being able to choose my own selection and then returning via post. Too much hassle, so we (as a school) no longer use the service.

Haven't used since the changes. Couldn't be bothered with the hassle. Certainly won't bother using it now. It's still a hassle to get books from public library & return them, but at least I know what I'm getting & they're there when I want them!!

I don't think any of us will use this again. Way too late and one person doing orders is ridiculous.

It was useless. I put in an order and so did another teacher - they sent a puny number relating to the topic and there was nowhere near enough to share. I've ended up leaving them all in her room. At least one person might as well get some use out of them.

It's such a waste of time! Now we have been told that even if you want picture books for 5 year olds you are only allowed to order them using an inquiry question!!!

So many issues at our school.

We ordered books in week 2 of term one for our term one inquiry! They arrived on the Monday of week 11 and weren't really suitable for juniors anyway! Waste of time!!!!

Ordering for the whole school hasn't worked. All of us are doing different inquiries. Preferred the old system.

What I used to love was choosing books that suited my class and needs. What suits my class does not suit the whole school!!!!

Very frustrating. Orders arrive about 2 months after ordering, way too late, and term 3 and 4 orders now is ridiculous. Staff I spoke to there hate it too. We are thinking of ditching it too. Pity, because it used to be a great service!

Still waiting for our books for this term haha.

Useless now, I like choosing my own books. They arrive late, they don't suit my learners, I hate the New system.

I think we've all emailed and written and reposted to stop this and it's all still motored along. I think we can all see that they'll be closing the national library and giving schools the books. what about rural schools without other access points?

I like to go in and pick my own books in the holidays. What a treat to spend a day in the library!!! Can't do that now.

that was the best. I would take my 5 year old with me. she'd find a corner and just immerse herself in literature. what need is there for validation if we've got kids hungry for books. let's feed them.

The Government did cut the service severely probably a couple of years ago now. Doing what this lot do; take a working, useful, functional tool and kill it.  They don't want it to work. They want to get rid of it. So what one does if one's aim is to achieve this loftily negative aim is to eviscerate said organisation, demoralise the staff, await the complaints and then shut it down completely because it wasn't functioning at all well. They achieve their nefarious aims whilst being able to say that they are responding to the people. Advanced Bastardry in action.

Our school does not use the National Library any longer. We don't have the staff to dedicate to organising the resource. So thank god for Auckland Libraries because I'm now going there and borrowing books for my class. We are a decile 2 school and either I'm borrowing the books or we are going without. Ordering books on a topic can be costly as you pay $2 per book if you miss pick up... nevermind fees if you lose a book.

It looks like someone somewhere is looking to do away with the service... It gives the powers that be a genuine reason for stopping the service if we boycott. There was nothing wrong with popping in for an afternoon during the 'holidays' for a read and the odd chat with colleagues. A real shame!

They want it to not work so they have an excuse to shut it down.

Given it away as a dead duck - just pointless trying to access.

Is it true (we got an email from our Librarian) that we have to order term 3 AND 4 now?? or is that just us trying to get something in time?

Was a great resource which is no longer. Such a shame.

Totally dissatisfied. Arrived last term in week 8, and not here yet for this term. Sent them straight back last term in original box and will do the same this term. What is going on? This was once a great service and resource.

The following comments are from a thread on NZ Teachers in mid March 2016.

Why did the government change this fantastic service ... Such a valuable resource for teachers and children!!!! Unbelievably shortsighted .... What a schamozzel!!!!!

I feel so sad that I cannot go on and choose my own class books anymore. This new system is ridiculous.

Keen to hear how others track. Shame book list sent out isn't listed in groupings as in the request, instead of the WHOLE school listed alphabetically. Would be much easier to give each class the list matching their request.

it's just made it logistically harder for co-oridantors to manage - the old system was way better.

and we can't go in there to browse and borrow; just browse, pure torture if one then has to go online and order it once a term as part of specific title loan.

Still waiting for the books I ordered to arrive.....

We are using local libraries now. Nat library has dropped the ball IMHO... And so many of us end up paying the overdue fines!!!!!

I'm not going to order them. Painful. Will think about it for another time.

We literally got about 6 books each this term. Useless.

We didn't get term 1s allocation at all! Trying again for term 2 before we ditch.

We got books but others got them first, so a waste of time really!

Note that you have to order Term 3 AND 4 books at the start of Term 3. You only get your allocated amount, but they must cover both terms. What a joke - a library where you cannot browse and take books out!

Tuesday, 10 May 2016

Domestic Violence - everyone's problem

I have a confession to make. 

In 2008 when it was revealed that Tony Veitch had seriously assaulted his former partner Kristin Dunne-Powell, I strongly disagreed with the decision made to remove him from his position as the sports anchor on One News.  I certainly was appalled by the revelations of the assault on Ms Dunne-Powell, but I have a firm belief that actions outside the workplace should not influence your role within the workplace.

However, with the heightened public awareness of a lack of privacy in this highly media saturated society, that belief is well and firmly challenged. 

And each time there is a high profile, or any profile person, who is found to be less than what we expect in their private life, there is the pile on that destroys their public life.  Social media and MSM is reflective of how once society used to use the stocks to publicly embarrass a person who did wrong or how polite society would shun an individual and their family for doing the wrong thing.

So when Tony Veitch was put back on prime time breakfast radio, I was alarmed at the public reaction, but thought he was getting back on with life.  Then I noticed people who re-posted Veitchy Facebook posts getting a keyboard lashing in my Facebook timeline.  I decided it wasn't worth reposting his posts and tended to use the downward arrow to scoot past any of his posts that foolishly made it into my timeline from others.

But this week Veitch has once again raised the ire of the country.  It seems he has not learnt the lesson he was supposed to learn.  This has hurt not only his victim, but every victim of every domestic abuse situation because Tony Veitch has a platform, a platform he can use to effect a positive change - if he was to choose to do so - because he has the ear of the men of New Zealand.

Personally, I have never been the subject of physical abuse in a relationship, but I do count myself lucky that I did leave a controlling relationship after six months.  I'm far to independent to have some bloke monopolise my time and try to spend all my waking and sleeping moments with me.  He picked his target poorly. 

But we don't always see that when we are in the relationship, and domestic violence can happen to anyone, from any walk or station of life, rich or poor, at any age.  And New Zealand has an appalling record of domestic violence, with the police attending a domestic violence event every five minutes on average, with 14 women, 6 men and 10 children on average dying annually at the hands of a family member or partner.

Sourced from Google via shesaidyes.co.nz
And when you know someone who has lost their mum to domestic violence, it hits home a bit more. 

My friend and her siblings will go through the majority of their lives not having their mum in their life.  Helen Mead was killed by her husband when she made the decision to leave.  Her daughters were at primary and secondary school, her son a young man in his early working life.  Every time they hear of a domestic violence death, their devastation they live with daily is amplified yet again.  In If Only from TVNZ's Sunday programme, Helen's father and daughter explain the reality of domestic violence. 

I'm so proud of my friend for speaking out for her mum.  She and her grandfather have spoken out to make the positive change in breaking domestic abuse.

This week the New Zealand Herald began their series on domestic violence in New Zealand.  They opened with a piece from Tony Veitch.  I'm not going to quote Veitch at all, or link to his piece, because by now you all know that all he did was make out that the only time he lost it with Ms Dunne-Powell was the time he kicked her so hard he broke her back, how disappointed with himself he was, didn't even apologising to Ms Dunne-Powell for the pain and anguish he caused, and how hard it has been for him to rebuild his life. 

This was countered in Stuff by Ms Dunne-Powell's father chastising Veitch for not apologising to his daughter or acknowledging that the incident was not a one off, but part of a pattern of physical abuse throughout the relationship.  And that fact is record - the list of how Veitch assaulted Ms Dunne-Powell over the course of their relationship is public record and appalling.

Many other blog posts from others have preceded mine, mostly in support of Ms Dunne-Powell and also chastising Veitch for attempting to portray himself as a victim and missing the opportunity to make a positive change to help break the cycle of domestic abuse in New Zealand.  Mine will probably only add to that.

But in today's NZ Herald I was heartened by an article, with a video, Family violence: Breaking the cycle of 30 years of abuse which focused on Jeremey Eparaima explaining how his cycle of violence began for him, how in each new relationship he escalated from verbal threats to pushing, then slapping, then punching and kicking, to choking and holding a knife at his partner's throat.  He explained how to the outside world he was an all round good guy, successful at work, popular on the rugby field, who abused his partners, terrorised his children and never was charged once by the police, despite the neighbours ringing the cops on a number of occasions. 

He talked about the regret, the self-loathing, the promises of not to do it again, how it would be good, and then his rage would return.  He talks about the stats of women and children killed through domestic violence, and believes that fact that he didn't add to the statistics was not through good management of his behaviour.

Mr Eparaima talks about how he accidentally ended up at an anger management course supporting a mate who he thought really had a problem, and then realised he had big issues of his own.  He then re-enrolled to start the following course - and that's how he began to stop the cycle of abuse he had carried on from his own childhood, how he is now giving talks and advising new police recruits about the effects of domestic violence and how to recognise it.



This quote from the article sums up where Mr Eparaima is with his family situation currently:

He has apologised to his former partners -- and his kids. He will be making amends with them until the day he dies and feels thankful that he has relationships with them and is able to be a grandfather to their children.


What is the difference between Veitch's piece and this article on Mr Eparaima?  The difference is ownership and acknowledgement and making constructive change to stop the cycle of abuse.

Kyle McDonald has an opinion piece in today's NZ Herald about domestic violence too: Family violence: Kyle MacDonald: Domestic violence is a male problem.  Kyle is a person I respect for his stand on mental health, rape culture, feminism, and domestic violence issues - I respect him, but I don't always agree with him.  I don't think domestic violence is a male problem, because women are capable of inflicting it as well, so therefore I think it is everyone's problem. 

Yes, men are more likely to inflict domestic violence, and women are more likely to be on the receieving end, and these men need to change their behaviour and take responsibility for it - no argument there - but that doesn't mean that this isn't a problem for women to be part of the solution. 

Sometimes a woman is the catalyst for the man to change - by leaving and telling her story, which is so much easier said than done - read Family Violence: 'He held a chainsaw to my neck' for one woman's story of trying to leave an abusive relationship, which contains the some traits many women's stories of leaving have.  However, lets not give up on the capacity of women to do this, to leave, to initiate a break in the cycle.

But men like Jeremy Eparaima changing how they behave and speaking out are essential.  Having beds available at Women's Refuge helps (remember that time the Christchurch one closed because it couldn't access government funding?).  Having police who will take action helps.  Having a justice system that will protect the victim helps.  Being an aware friend or neighbour or member of society helps.

I like what Mr Eparaima had to say today:

           "Stopping family violence is everyone's job. It is everyone's job to go next door if you hear something
             going on; if you see something in a carpark it is up to you to go and make sure everything is okay.
          "Lifting awareness is the only way we're going to stop this epidemic.  There needs to be a change."

Yes, New Zealand is below the standard on domestic violence and finding solutions.  We need to keep talking and implementing solutions and helping people to break the cycle of domestic abuse.

Like others have said earlier this week, Tony Veitch had the opportunity to use his platform for making a positive change in the lives of other abusers by helping them see the way to break the cycle of domestic abuse.

He didn't.

So Tony Veitch, you failed the standard.


Where can you find help if you are in a domestic abuse situation?
It's Not OK - Information line 0800 456 450
Women's Refuge - Free national crisisline operates 24/7 - 0800 REFUGE or 0800 733 843
Shine - free national helpline 9am- 11pm every day - 0508 744 633
Shakti: Providing specialist cultural services for African, Asian and Middle Eastern women and their children. Crisisline 24/7 0800 742 584
White Ribbon NZ

Help for men wanting to break the cycle of domestic abuse:
If you are experiencing or witnessing violence, or want to change your own behaviour, you can ask for help. It can be hard, but getting involved or reaching out for help for yourself could save a life.
• It's Not OK information line 0800-456-450 for information about services that can help men.
• Shine runs a No Excuses stopping-violence programme for men. Ring the helpline on 0508-744-633 to find a programme near you or even if you just want to talk to someone and talk through your options.
National Network of Stopping Violence

Thanks to the NZ Herald for a great series and the help info.

Tuesday, 9 February 2016

Protesting - Is it still allowed in New Zealand? Are we still a democracy? Are the media the Spanish Inquisition?


You are probably now very familiar with the dildo throwing incident at Waitangi on Friday 5 February 2016, where a female protester, Josie Butler, threw what we now know was actually a squeaky dildo shaped toy at Minister Steven Joyce's face.  To his credit, Joyce took it on the chin and joked afterwards that someone needed to alert John Oliver from the comedy media show Last Week Tonight so the incident could go to ground faster.


Josie Butler was arrested, but no charges have been laid.  She stated that the NZ Police were professional and did their job appropriately.  Steven Joyce doesn't want to delve into it further, but John Key stated on TVNZ's Breakfast yesterday, "I don't buy the argument that she's some hard-working nurse that we should feel sorry for - I'm sorry."

And here in lies the kicker.  Yes, Josie Butler is a nurse.  A nurse who following the Christchurch earthquakes five years ago received an award from then mayor, Bob Parker, for outstanding service.  Butler has held grave concerns about the TPPA for several years, after being alerted through her union, NZNO (Nurse's Organisation) about the implications to Pharmac, medicines and our health system. 

Butler is not the only person in the health system to share these concerns.  The concerns go right to the top of our medical hierarchy with high ranking medical specialists signing a document expressing their concerns about how the TPPA will impact Pharmac and our health system.

So Butler did not stand still.  She was part of a team in Christchurch that raised awareness of the TPPA, lobbied the city council and protested the TPPA at each opportunity.  This year she took the time out to travel to Waitangi as this offered another opportunity to protest.

Her protesting colleagues did not know what she had planned.  They are divided over the course of action she took.  Some have remonstrated her.  Ms Butler apparently has apologised for any offense caused and has been invited back to Waitangi for 2017.

But the media do not like to let a story go.  And this is what got my juices running hot this morning:

Exactly Helen!!!  You can read the latest version of this article here.  But this sentence stood out for me:

Canterbury District Health Board general manager of people and capability Michael Frampton said the DHB would not comment on whether Butler faced any disciplinary measures.

Was this protester protesting while she was at work? Was she wearing any clothing that showed her workplace? Did she do anything to promote her workplace apart from stating that she was a nurse who opposed the TPPA on grounds of how it will affect our health system (in the first place)?
 
Apart from the fact that she threw a squeaky toy shaped like a dildo at a Minister of the Crown, how was her protest against the TPPA any different than the tens of thousands of others who, like me, marched down Queen St last Thursday.

Does the media intend contacting every employer or educational institution these people work for/belong to find out what disciplinary action (if any) they will be taking against people exercising their democratic right to protest?

Over the last few years we have seen a number of people hounded out of their jobs, some for people doing something totally appalling in their job (think Paul Henry's removal from Breakfast after his comments on the then Governor General's birthplace) to those who did something outside their workplace that had nothing to do with their job (think Tony Veitch and his appalling domestic assault on his then partner). 

The media and the growing impact social media has a huge part to play in this, but when is enough enough?  When should media leave the job a person has out of it?  How much should our employers have a say over what we do, who we associate with, where we go and what we say when we are not at work?

And I say this with knowledge of how much an employer can interfere with our individual freedoms.  Currently, teachers are able to voice their opinion and protest against government on education policy and other matters.... but not for much longer.  The new version of the Teachers' Council, the Education Council aka EDUCANZ, wants to implement a Code of Conduct to replace the current Code of Ethics we operate under. 

The Code of Conduct, much like the one other state sector employees are subject to, does not allow a teacher to voice their opinion and protest.  Already this applies to our special education colleague who are directly employed by the MOE and therefore come under the state sector Code of Conduct.  They have not been able to voice the systematic gutting of special education services over the last seven years and how many children are now missing out on basic assistance to access education.

So as a teacher, will I, in future still be able to participate in a protest as I did last week against the TPPA by walking down Queen Street?  Will I still be able to be an active unionist who vehemently opposes GERM in education?  Will I still be able to be the educated professional that I am who opposes GERM based on how I know children learn and best practise teaching?  Will I still be able to publish this blog?

I believe that there is an epic failure in our society today when our democratic right to protest or to point out that a policy is fundamentally flawed will endanger our ability to work, that it gives an employer a right to dictate your private actions and thoughts.  Even more so, it is an epic failure that the media thinks they have the right to push into a workplace and demand to know what action an employer will take when everyone knows that that is a violation of the Employment Act to make such actions common knowledge.

So media, in my opinion, you have failed the standard.

How about you end your Spanish Inquisition on Josie Butler and actually do your job - get some answers out of John Key, Todd McClay, Steven Joyce and Bill English about the truth of TPPA.  While you're at it, ask Hekia Parata to be up front and truthful on how the TPPA will effect education and get Dr Jonathan Coleman to stop pussy footing around on how the TPPA will actually affect Pharmac.  Because our government has sold NZ down the road, and the media have failed the standard on doing their job of finding the truth on the TPPA.

Tuesday, 2 February 2016

The TPPA - why I oppose it.

Tomorrow the TPPA (Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement) will be signed in Auckland by the twelve participartory countries, maybe at Sky City... or maybe that's just a diversionary distination to waylay the protester, and I am pretty bloody pissed off about it.



Why?

Well first of all it has not even been through our parliament for debate, as the full and final text really only became available once the last parliamentary year finished.  Before that it was all leaks and conjectures about what the TPPA contained.  But those leaks and conjectures were a worry... and not too far from the truth as it turns out.

A couple of nights ago, I asked on a page operated by NZEI if there was an organised group attending the march in Auckland tomorrow.  I wanted to be with like minded friends to participate. 

One of the responses was this:   Is there a depth of understanding about the TPPA ??? What about advantages?

And I responded with this:

Tariff reductions are a great advantage. Opening up new markets is a great advantage. 
But this is why I don't support the TPPA:

  • It was negotiated in secret. Unlike previous FTAs, there was no bipartisan consultation with other political parties, no consultation with Tangata Whenua and little consultation with our own business leaders and academics. 
  • The Treaty of Waitangi is not mentioned in it. This is a defining piece of NZ law. There is precedence for it to be included. It was part of the FTA Phil Goff negotiated with China.
  • Unlike Australia or Singapore or a few other nations, we have no rights to invoke protections as to who can come in and buy land and houses from overseas. Even implementing something as simple as requiring a foreigner to build a new home rather than buy an existing house would not be allowed. 
  • The increased lengths of patents on biomedications and the like will blow our health budget out of the water and continue delays and denials of access to the best treatments for people suffering from health conditions. 
  • Copyright law changes will makes books more expensive - not great for public libraries and schools and the like.
  • The fact that when our government wants to change a law, they will have to allow foreign nationals and corporates to make submissions. Stop and think about how that will likely have a negative effect on environmental or employment law for example. If you think I'm not realistic, did you know the company that runs Auckland's trains, Veolia, has sued Egypt for raising the minimum wage? Now think about how Peter Jackson and Warner Bros has already influenced employment law for actors and film workers in NZ.
  • Tim Groser promised us a gold plated deal and that he wouldn't bow down to continued tariffs and restrictions on our dairy trade. Then he made us eat dead rats over that, and American and Canadian dairy farmers breathed a Collective sigh of relief when Groser rolled over. The benefits to the dairy industry are minimal, as they are over all. Tufts University predicts without the TPPA NZ would have a 46% increase in GPD by 2030; with it the increase would be 47% - consequently, business wise, the TPPA is negligible. 
  • And this is the complete deal breaker for me: the impact on our quality public education system in NZ. Let's say a company from the US arrives called XYZ Ed. They can demand that the NZ government give them money to set up a charter school in NZ. Despite the fact that where they set it up doesn't need a new school. With our tax payer dollars. And we all know NZ charter schools aren't subjected to the scrutiny that state schools are. And why? Because the TPPA allows it. Singapore's negotiators didn't agree to that one and had it written out of their part of the agreement. 
Which then begs the question: what bloody use was Tim Groser as a negotiator? 
 
The fish hooks are too many!
 
And finally let me put it this way, if I offered you a chicken sandwich made with fresh bread and fresh cooked chicken with a lovely chutney but laced with rat poison, would you take it and eat it? Because that's what the TPPA effectively is.
 
Another contributor also added this in support:
 
When our government signed up to the Treaty of Waitangi Act in 1975 we accepted three fundamental principles of the Treaty: Partnership, Protection and Participation. (The Act doesn't actually say that but that it is how it is interpreted and implemented in the public service.) 

The TPPA hardly embodies these: no Maori have been partners in the negotiation; there are severe concerns that our assets and sovereignty will not be protected; and there has been no participation in what has been an entirely secret set of dealing and wheeling. smile emoticon

If we value the Treaty of Waitangi, we need to value it every day of the year. It seems to me that John Key has ignored it 364 days of the year and then wants to be valued and honoured on the one day that is Waitangi Day. 

Sorry - that doesn't wash with me.
 
So tomorrow I intend to march with thousands of other New Zealanders because I simply do not believe that this deal is in the best interests of New Zealand and its people long term in its current format.
 
Like Andrew Little said last week, I support Free Trade but I do not support our sovereignty being pulled from under us and I believe that the best deal for New Zealand is not in the TPPA.
 
I like the fact that Labour waited for the full text to be available before making a declaration on its TPPA stand.  It is what Andrew Little said they would do - read the text and talk to experts and get advice and then make a decision about how it met Labour's stated five bottom lines it released in mid 2015..
 
I respect that the Greens and New Zealand First made the decision long before seeing the text.  Fletcher Tabuteau, an economics lecturer in his former life, was able to clearly show how the numbers just do not stack up greatly for New Zealand under the TPPA during the Auckland Town Hall meeting last week.  Metiria Turei was able to show the impacts on sovereignty, workers, the environment and many other things Kiwis value.
 
Marama Fox from the Maori Party also demonstrated how the TPPA will impact on the Treaty of Waitangi and how that breaches the needs of Maori and continues to make Maori victims of colonisation.  Of course, Maori will not be the only indigenous people of the countries participating to be affected, but Maori are unique due to the recognition of the Treaty of Waitangi in New Zealand law in 1975.
 
Lori Wallach pointed out at the Town Hall meeting that the TPPA in its current form would not make it through Congress in the US.  Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans support it.  The Republicans view clauses in it to be even weaker than what George W Bush managed to negotiate in his FTAs when it comes to the environment.  In fact, here is a tweet published by Elizabeth Warren's Official twitter account today.  Elizabeth Warren is a Democrat Senator from Massachusetts and an academic of commercial and bankruptcy law, formerly of Harvard University.
 

And when you look at this tweet in the context of those before an after, it speaks volumes about the position that Congress is taking.

 
There have been protests in Malaysia in regards to losing control of their economy, the impacts on small and medium sized business and the costs of medicine under the TPPA in Malaysia. Other countries in South America have also had protests against the TPPA and the Pacific Island countries, who relied on New Zealand to protect and promote their interests, are not happy with the outcome.  The lead negotiator from Japan has had to resign his positions after corruption and bribery allegations have been made against him.
 
And in response to detractors of Dr Jane Kelsey, New Zealand's foremost knowledgeable academic on the TPPA and Auckland University professor, it is her job as an academic to investigate such deals and put them under the microscope, to put them up for rigorous debate.  She knows New Zealand law by the back of her hand.  And Dr Kelsey is not alone, as many of her fellow academics have contributed to the analysis of what the TPPA would mean to New Zealand.
 
Even Tufts University in Massachusetts USA has cast shade on some of the claims to emerge from the TPPA.  Their analysis proves that the propaganda being put about by our National led government is folly and fantasy.  Click here for one such analysis.
 
In my view, Tim Groser failed to meet the standard as a negotiator and a protector of New Zealand's best interests.  John Key has failed to meet the standard of being the Prime Minister of New Zealand by failing to protect the best interests of the New Zealand people, its businesses and economy.
 

If you are wanting to find out more for yourself to help you form your own view, here are some links to some vital information: